United Kingdom · London · London
Data is aggregated from public sources and may be incomplete or out of date. Always verify with primary sources before acting on any figure. See data sources.
For families
Step-by-step guidance using the United Kingdom system — addresses, money services, visit booking, what to bring on your first visit.
UK Local prison operated by HM Prison & Probation Service. Listed in the GOV.UK Find a prison directory.
Capacity
—
Current population
—
Occupancy
—
Year opened
—
Operational
Figures from official sources · verified 7 Jul 2026 · methodology
Operator
HM Prison & Probation ServicePopulation held
male
Opened
—
Region
London
Security level
Medium
Death-row facility
No
Brixton is one of the oldest and most overcrowded prisons in the national leaders had decided to change Brixton’s function. It was due to become a category B reception prison to ease population pressures in This review visit followed up on the concerns we raised at our last the following judgements about outcomes for prisoners. Figure 1: HMP Brixton healthy prison outcomes in 2022 and 2024 employment was poor – and Ofsted awarded its lowest score – as was of purposeful activity and overcrowded living conditions both affected prisoners’ feelings of safety; there were high levels of violence and significant drug use. There were not enough middle managers and leaders (see Glossary) visible around the prison who could set high At this independent review of progress, we considered whether leaders had made progress against eight of our concerns and three themes against one of our concerns, reasonable progress against another, leaders to help Brixton and other London prisons to recruit successfully. — UK IMB Annual Report (2024) — Safety: 4.1 Reception and induction • The small sample of induction sessions that the Board attended showed sympathetic questioning and covered care experience, including suicidal feelings, visits and debt problems. We noted that a man could opt to be checked every four hours by night staff on his first night. The change to a smaller reception wing mid-year gave new arrivals a less stressful induction: [...] Respect: 5.1 Accommodation, clothing, food • The oldest wings of the prison, A and B, probably date from the first half of the 19th century. Taking one of these cells at random, we measured it as 6.4m2. Subtract the footprints of a double bunk, TV table, toilet, side table and wash basin and the remainder was about 3m2 available for walking around, usually shared with a cellmate. The toilet is about a [...] Purposeful activity: • As we reported last year, there were backlogs in induction in the first half of the year, with 108 men were waiting at end October; at the end of the reporting year, this was 109, but this blockage had, by then, been bypassed by drawing on responses already given by men in their previous prisons. With the change of D wing into an induction wing, procedures were much quicker and education [...] Preparation for release: • The early release scheme (SDS40), allowing prisoners to be released at 40% of their sentence, rather than the usual 50%, consisted of two tranches (54 men in September and a further 31 in October). Of the London prisons, Brixton had the most men to release. The OMU had a greatly increased workload in the weeks before and 10 of the 54 did not know where they would be sleeping that night. [...]
time of this latest visit. However, since our full inspection in June 2024, visited for this review of progress. This review visit followed up on the concerns we raised at our last What we found during this review visit of this visit, it was holding around 700 adult men, more than 200 of
temporary governor recently in post and an inexperienced leadership team, this to be permitted to spend much longer on the phone than others. This lack of
resettlement prison since 2012, and it held about 680 prisoners at the Note: rehabilitation and release planning became ‘preparation for release’ in October 2023. At the 2024 inspection, the provision of education, training and work to prepare men for their eventual release. Too many prisoners were being released from Brixton without their offending behaviour of purposeful activity and overcrowded living conditions both affected prisoners spent unlocked and in purposeful activity had hardly quality of education and training, as well as allocation to activities and the education department. There were still very few interventions to worked hard to fix the gaps in public protection work.
prisoners’ feelings of safety; there were high levels of violence and significant drug use. There were not enough middle managers and been done to prevent self-harm. However, efforts to stop the ingress of drugs were good.
Derived signal — not a judgement. How it's calculated
What the score is responding to:
This facility scores 25. The national average across 584 scored United Kingdom facilities is 4 — 21 points above national average.
Same country, matched on type + security level where possible.
1.1 Brixton is one of the oldest and most overcrowded prisons in the country. Located in South London, it has been a category C resettlement prison since 2012, and it held about 680 prisoners at the time of this latest visit. However, since our full inspection in June 2024, national leaders had decided to change Brixton’s function. It was due to become a category B reception prison to ease population pressures in the South East and would accept men directly from court. No final date had been set for this change, but plans were under way when we visited for this review of progress. 1.2 This review visit followed up on the concerns we raised at our last inspection of HMP Brixton in 2024. What we found at our last inspection 1.3 At our previous inspections of HMP Brixton in 2022 and 2024, we made the following judgements about outcomes for prisoners. Figure 1: HMP Brixton healthy prison outcomes in 2022 and 2024 Note: rehabilitation and release planning became ‘preparation for release’ in October 2023. 1.4 At the 2024 inspection, the provision of education, training and employment was poor – and Ofsted awarded its lowest score – as was work to prepare men for their eventual release. Too many prisoners were being released from Brixton without their offending behaviour being addressed, including a large cohort of prisoners convicted of sexual offences, for whom there were no interventions at all. The lack of purposeful activity and overcrowded living conditions both affected prisoners’ feelings of safety; there were high levels of violence and significant drug use. There were not enough middle managers and leaders (see Glossary) visible around the prison who could set high standards and drive improvement. Report of an independent review of progress at HMP Brixton What we found during this review visit 1.5 At this independent review of progress, we considered whether leaders had made progress against eight of our concerns and three themes identified by Ofsted. Overall, the prison had made good progress against one of our concerns, reasonable progress against another, insufficient progress against five and no meaningful progress against one. Against Ofsted’s themes, there had been insufficient progress in two areas and reasonable progress in one. 1.6 There were still not enough middle managers to ensure high standards across the prison, and much more support was needed from national leaders to help Brixton and other London prisons to recruit successfully. The senior leadership team was very understandably focused on the planned change of function. There was still too little to encourage prisoners to behave well and look after their wings, although we found two examples of notable positive practice. More could have been done to prevent self-harm. However, efforts to stop the ingress of drugs were good. 1.7 The prison remained very overcrowded, and the amount of time that prisoners spent unlocked and in purposeful activity had hardly improved since the inspection. Ofsted remained concerned about the quality of education and training, as well as allocation to activities and attendance. However, they identified reasonable progress in staffing the education department. There were still very few interventions to help prisoners think about changing their behaviour, but managers had worked hard to fix the gaps in public protection work. 1.8 The transition back to a category B reception prison is a huge undertaking for Brixton and planning had taken much of leaders’ attention since the 2024 inspection. Understandably, they had struggled to address some of our concerns with so much in flux. The date for completion had already been pushed back and there was a great deal still to do, including ongoing recruitment of middle managers, improvements in security, the reintroduction of an inpatient unit and
Dating from the beginning of the 19th century, Brixton is one of the oldest prisons in the country and is now a category C resettlement prison serving South London and the wider region. With capacity for up to 798 prisoners, about 740 were in residence at the time of our inspection, although this figure belies the conditions behind the prison’s walls: Brixton remains the most overcrowded category C prison in the country. The throughput of prisoners is considerable, with around 140 men being released each month. Compounding these issues, the jail holds a complex population with a large proportion of prisoners experiencing substance misuse and/or mental health challenges. This is the third time we have been to Brixton since 2022, a year in which we carried out both a full inspection and an independent review of progress. At that time, we described a struggling institution where outcomes were assessed as ‘poor’ in two of our healthy prison tests, respect and purposeful activity, with outcomes being only a little better in safety and preparation for release. At this inspection we found that, although outcomes had improved marginally in
• The early release scheme (SDS40), allowing prisoners to be released at 40% of their sentence, rather than the usual 50%, consisted of two tranches (54 men in September and a further 31 in October). Of the London prisons, Brixton had the most men to release. The OMU had a greatly increased workload in the weeks before and 10 of the 54 did not know where they would be sleeping that night. Arrangements were made for them, including means to draw benefits immediately via several local Job Centres. Also available in the departure lounge portacabin were St Mungo's, external probation and PACT. The need to separate PCoSOs and other non- associates (such as gang members) was well planned. • The initial plan (in late 2024) was to re-role the prison categorisation around mid- 2025. Ahead of this, around May, the prison opposed a request from HMPPS to accept, as priority for transfers to Brixton, men with the shortest time left to serve. They agreed to accept those with a minimum of 28 days to serve. This increased the churn to up to 50 or more releases in a week and, by the year end, about 70% of the population had 12 weeks or less to serve, this being the time at which most of the pre-release actions are triggered (7.5 below). • Sentence re-calculations, which should be done within five working days of arrival fell behind schedule, although by the year end the backlog had been reduced to about two weeks. Some incorrect calculations by previous prisons, two regional ones in [...]
5.1 Accommodation, clothing, food • The oldest wings of the prison, A and B, probably date from the first half of the 19th century. Taking one of these cells at random, we measured it as 6.4m2. Subtract the footprints of a double bunk, TV table, toilet, side table and wash basin and the remainder was about 3m2 available for walking around, usually shared with a cellmate. The toilet is about a metre from the bunk, on which prisoners sit to eat their meals. Provision of a privacy curtain around the toilet was checked regularly. Without across a chair in the cell, men spent much of the day lying on their bunk beds. This is manifestly too crowded. Although this has always been the case and is a problem in almost all prisons across the estate, familiarity should not prevent our reminding the reader of it. Food • The quality and variety of food gets consistently high marks from prisoners and the kitchen was, at Christmas, a finalist for prison catering team of the year. Their prisoner satisfaction survey scored 80% against a national average of just 30%. We sampled the food regularly and found it to be hot, tasty and sufficient at the serveries. A visit in January by the regional catering supervisor confirmed this. The catering staff visit the wings regularly and chair a committee with wing representatives to discuss menu preferences. • The catering budget for three meals increased during the reporting year from £3.12 to £3.80 per day, per prisoner. We have seen in the kitchen the [...]
• As we reported last year, there were backlogs in induction in the first half of the year, with 108 men were waiting at end October; at the end of the reporting year, this was 109, but this blockage had, by then, been bypassed by drawing on responses already given by men in their previous prisons. With the change of D wing into an induction wing, procedures were much quicker and education inductions were completed within two working days of arrival. IAG (information advice and guidance, a separate contract from Novus) was more of a problem, apparently the consequence of their internal staffing shortfalls, according to senior staff in the learning, skills and education team. • From February, the allocations board was working more efficiently and 80-90% of men were assigned to education or work within a week of arrival. For many months of the year, however, about 40% of the population were listed in the daily report as unemployed (about 130), awaiting inductions or refusing to participate (about 10). • The regional quality manager for education told us in November that, as in other regional prisons, it was still a problem recruiting and retaining good maths and English teachers, subjects where standards still fell short. He spoke well of the departmental leadership, and horticulture was described as inspiring (though see 7.2 below). Ofsted returned (with HMIP) in March and found insufficient progress in the speed of allocation and quality of education, but that sufficient [...]
4.1 Reception and induction • The small sample of induction sessions that the Board attended showed sympathetic questioning and covered care experience, including suicidal feelings, visits and debt problems. We noted that a man could opt to be checked every four hours by night staff on his first night. The change to a smaller reception wing mid-year gave new arrivals a less stressful induction: men there spoke to us appreciatively of the staff. • As was the case last year, some men transferred to Brixton were clearly not suitable for a category C prison: one was already e-listed (escape risk) from a category B CSU and on an ACCT (self-harm monitoring – see 4.2). Another man arrived with a history of 17 adjudications (six of which had been referred to the police) within a 12- month period, including several assaults on staff. Despite this, he was re-categorised to category C in June 2024 and transferred to Brixton in September. A further assault led to this man being recategorised to category B and he was transferred out in mid- September. • Induction fairs were held weekly, with the chaplaincy team, the Shannon Trust, the gym, the charity Prison Advice and Care Trust (PACT), the OMU, learning and skills and Job Centre represented. • We were told of frequent delays in reception, when the transport brought the wrong files for the prisoners they conveyed. 4.2 Suicide and self-harm • Weekly safety intervention meetings (SIM) discussed about 20 prisoners of concern and were [...]
1.1 HMP Brixton is a category C men’s resettlement prison situated in inner city London and is one of the oldest prisons in the country. At the time of this visit, it was holding around 700 adult men, more than 200 of whom were convicted of sexual offences. The prison accommodated more prisoners than it could house in decent conditions. Most cells were overcrowded, holding two prisoners in accommodation designed for one. 1.2 At our previous inspections of HMP Brixton in 2019 and 2022 we made the following judgements about outcomes for prisoners. Figure 1: HMP Brixton healthy prison outcomes in 2019 and 2022 Good Reasonably good Not sufficiently good Poor
This report into HMP Brixton revealed a prison that was in trouble. With a temporary governor recently in post and an inexperienced leadership team, this category C London resettlement prison will need considerable support and investment from HMPPS to get back on track. The behaviour on the wings was not good enough with prisoners breaking the rules without challenge from staff members who either did not have high enough expectations or who turned a blind eye. Prisoners were free to vape around the jail, the dress code was not enforced, and some prisoners appeared to be permitted to spend much longer on the phone than others. This lack of proper oversight had led to some individuals isolating on the wing without anyone noticing. There was inadequate care for some of the most vulnerable who, even when placed on an ACCT (assessment, care in custody, and teamwork), were not given the support that they needed. The system for applications had broken down meaning many were ignored or unanswered. This led to prisoners putting in complaints which were often dismissed. It took inspectors a long time to walk from one end of a wing to the other because they were stopped by so many prisoners eager to express their exasperation with life at the prison and their inability to get the support they needed to complete their sentence and prepare for release. ROTL had been suspended meaning that the prisoners – particularly those who had category D status, could not go out to work while they suffered interminable waits for transfer to an open prison. There were not nearly enough activities for the 724 prisoners, and only a lucky few were allocated to the high-quality workshops such as drywalling or painting. Those that were able to get prison jobs were often working part time or were not using skills that would be useful after release. Standards of education were poor with the quality of teaching in English and maths not good enough for the small number of prisoners who attended. On G wing, which held vulnerable prisoners, there was even less to do. The regime was restrictive and apart from the kitchen (which produced excellent food), there was little work or training. Prisoners on this wing told me they had made a mistake in opting to come to Brixton, and many compared it to a category B establishment. If this wing is to remain, leaders in the prison and at HMPPS will have to give some serious thought to how they improve provision to this largely compliant but frustrated group of prisoners some of whom, if they are not given suitable support or access to treatment programmes, could pose a risk to the public when they are released. The standards of accommodation were often very poor. Many prisoners shared tiny, cramped, and dilapidated cells with inadequate furniture and graffiti on the walls. Despite being rerolled in 2012 as a category C prison, Brixton had the feel of a local prison, but one in which prisoners were spending much longer periods of time. The experienced and effective temporary governor is in no doubt about the scale of the task of improving standards which had, unusually, fallen in three of our four healthy prison tests. If given enough time, she will certainly be able to address many of our concerns, but progress will be very constrained if the prison service does not provide material support in refurbishing cells and reducing the headcount so that there is enough meaningful activity to go round. HMPPS will need to consider whether there is any future for a vulnerable prisoners wing in such a small site. Ultimately, the only way that this prison can be more successful with so little space is if a substantial proportion of prisoners are going to work every day outside the wall. Charlie Taylor HM Chief Inspector of Prisons April 2022
How many of our profile fields are populated. We surface this so families and researchers know the limits.
Under CC-BY-4.0. Include the URL and access date; the site is a living reference and entries can change.
World Prisons. (2026). HMP Brixton. Retrieved July 21, 2026, from https://worldprisons.com/prisons/hmp-brixton
"HMP Brixton." World Prisons. Accessed July 21, 2026. https://worldprisons.com/prisons/hmp-brixton.
@misc{worldprisons-hmp-brixton,
author = {{World Prisons}},
title = {HMP Brixton},
year = {2026},
url = {https://worldprisons.com/prisons/hmp-brixton},
urldate = {2026-07-21}
}