Norway

• CASE OF SAARIVUOMA SAMI VILLAGE v. NORWAY2026-03-03
  ECHRno violationArticle 35 ECHR

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property)

• CASE OF GREENPEACE NORDIC AND OTHERS v. NORWAY2025-10-28
  ECHRno violationArticle 34 ECHR, Article 35 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR

  Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life)

• CASE OF HAUGEN v. NORWAY2024-10-15
  ECHRviolationArticle 35 ECHR, Article 2 ECHR, Article 13 ECHR, Article 41 ECHR

  Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+2 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2-1 - Life;Article 2 - Right to life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

• CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY2022-03-24
  ECHRno violationArticle 8 ECHR, Article 14 ECHR, Article 35 ECHR

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)

• CASE OF A.L. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY2022-01-20
  ECHRviolationArticle 8 ECHR, Article 35 ECHR, Article 41 ECHR

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

• CASE OF E.M. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY2022-01-20
  ECHRno violationArticle 8 ECHR, Article 34 ECHR, Article 35 ECHR

  Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)

• CASE OF JALLOW v. NORWAY2021-12-02
  ECHRno violationArticle 6 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Article 35 ECHR

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms)

• CASE OF SABER v. NORWAY2020-12-17
  ECHRviolationArticle 8 ECHR, Article 35 ECHR, Article 41 ECHR

  Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione personae);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

• CASE OF STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY2019-09-10
  ECHRviolationArticle 8 ECHR, Article 35 ECHR, Article 41 ECHR

  Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

• CASE OF STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY2017-11-30
  ECHRno violationArticle 8 ECHR, Article 34 ECHR, Article 35 ECHR

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)

• CASE OF VILNES AND OTHERS v. NORWAY2013-12-05
  ECHRno violationArticle 2 ECHR, Article 3 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Article 35 ECHR, Article 41 ECHR

  Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman punishment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award

Browse the full human-rights cases index or view filtered search