CASE OF RAZVOZZHAYEV v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND UDALTSOV v. RUSSIA

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (Ukraine);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Security of person) (Ukraine);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (Russia);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Security of person) (Russia);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonably necessary to prevent offence) (Russia);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) (Russia);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms) (Russia);Violation of Article 6+6-1 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-b - Adequate time) (Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial) (Russia);Violation of Article 6+6-1 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-b - Adequate facilities;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) (Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial) (Russia);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (Russia);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) (Russia);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Russia);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (Ukraine);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (Russia)

External references

• European Court of Human Rights reference: 001-198480
• Full case text