All cases
CASE OF CIMPAKA KAPETA v. BELGIUM
European Court of Human Rightsno violation2025-06-26
Respondent: Belgium
Article 35 ECHR, Article 13 ECHR
Case summary
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom to leave a country);No violation of Article 13+P4-2 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general};Article 2 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom to leave a country)
External references
- European Court of Human Rights reference: 001-244061
- Read the judgment
Related cases
Same source, country, and finding where possible.
- CASE OF KHATTAB v. BELGIUMECHR2026-03-05· no-violation
- CASE OF COULIBALY v. BELGIUMECHR2025-07-24· no-violation
- CASE OF ENGELS v. BELGIUMECHR2025-05-27· no-violation
- CASE OF BODSON AND OTHERS v. BELGIUMECHR2025-01-16· no-violation
- CASE OF EL AROUD AND B.S. v. BELGIUMECHR2024-12-05· no-violation
- CASE OF EXECUTIEF VAN DE MOSLIMS VAN BELGIÃ AND OTHERS v. BELGIUMECHR2024-02-13· no-violation