CASE OF BLAJ v. ROMANIA [Extracts]
Case summary
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of petition)
External references
- European Court of Human Rights reference: 001-142529
- Read the judgment
Related cases
Same source, country, and finding where possible.
- CASE OF VASILE RUSU v. ROMANIAECHR2025-11-04· no-violation
- CASE OF BÄDESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAECHR2025-04-15· no-violation
- CASE OF BRD – GROUPE SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE S.A. v. ROMANIAECHR2025-03-18· no-violation
- CASE OF VASILE PRUTEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAECHR2025-01-14· no-violation
- CASE OF SEVERIN v. ROMANIAECHR2024-10-08· no-violation
- CASE OF BECHI v. ROMANIAECHR2024-06-25· no-violation